NEW QUESTION 56 Which command in a CLI session is used to check installed licenses on the Harmony Endpoint Management Server?
To check installed licenses on the Harmony Endpoint Management Server via the command-line interface (CLI), the correct command is cplic print -x. This is a standard Check Point command for displaying detailed license information, as referenced in theCP_R81.20_Harmony_Endpoint_Server_AdminGuide.pdfon page 58 under “Getting Licenses.” While the document does not list the command explicitly in a step-by-step format, it discusses license management and implies the use of standard Check Point CLI tools. The cplic print -x command is widely recognized in Check Point environments to output license details, including expiration dates and features, making it the appropriate choice for troubleshooting license status on the server. Option B (“show licenses all”) is not a valid Check Point CLI command; it resembles syntax from other systems but not Check Point’s. Option C (“cplic add <license filename=””>”) is for adding a license, not checking existing ones (page 58 mentions applying licenses, not viewing them). Option D (“cplic print +x”) contains a syntax error; the correct flag is <code>-x</code>, not <code>+x</code>. Thus, option A is the verified answer based on Check Point’s CLI conventions and the guide’s context.</license> References: CP_R81.20_Harmony_Endpoint_Server_AdminGuide.pdf, Page 58: Getting Licenses (discusses license management, implying standard CLI usage).
NEW QUESTION 60 You are facing a lot of CPU usage and high bandwidth consumption on your Endpoint Security Server. You check and verify that everything is working as it should be, but the performance is still very slow. What can you do to decrease your bandwidth and CPU usage?
High CPU usage and bandwidth consumption on the Endpoint Security Server can significantly impact performance. While theCP_R81.20_Harmony_Endpoint_Server_AdminGuide.pdfdoes not explicitly mention “Super Nodes” as a term within the provided extracts, the concept aligns with Check Point’s strategies for distributing load and optimizing resource usage, such as using Endpoint Policy Servers (EPS) or peer-to-peer mechanisms common in endpoint security solutions. Option D suggests leveraging endpoints as Super Nodes to offload server tasks, which is a plausible approach to reduce both bandwidth and CPU usage. Onpage 25, under “Optional Endpoint Security Elements,” the documentation describes Endpoint Policy Servers as a method to alleviate server load: “Endpoint Policy Servers improve performance in large environments by managing most communication with the Endpoint Security clients. Managing the Endpoint Security client communication decreases the load on the Endpoint Security Management Server, and reduces the bandwidth required between sites.” While EPS are dedicated servers, the idea of distributing workload to endpoints (as Super Nodes) follows a similar principle. Super Nodes typically act as distribution points for updates, policies, or logs, reducing direct server-client interactions. Although not detailed in the provided document, this is a recognized practice in Check Point’s ecosystem and endpoint security at large, making Option D the most effective solution among the choices. Let’s evaluate the alternatives: * Option A: “The management High Availability sizing is not correct. You have to purchase more servers and add them to the cluster.” High Availability (HA) is addressed onpage 202under “Management High Availability,” focusing on redundancy and failover, not performance optimization. Adding servers might help distribute load, but it’s a costly and indirect solution compared to leveraging existing endpoints. * Option B: “Your company’s size is not large enough to have a valid need for Endpoint Solution.” This is illogical and unsupported by the documentation. Endpoint security is essential regardless of company size, as noted onpage 19under “Introduction to Endpoint Security.” * Option C: “Your company needs more bandwidth. You have to increase your bandwidth by 300%.” Increasing bandwidth addresses only one aspect (bandwidth consumption) and not CPU usage. It’s an inefficient fix that doesn’t tackle the root cause, and no documentation supports such an extreme measure. Thus,Option Dis the best answer, inferred from Check Point’s load distribution principles, even though “Super Nodes” isn’t explicitly cited in the provided extracts. References: CP_R81.20_Harmony_Endpoint_Server_AdminGuide.pdf, Page 25: “Optional Endpoint Security Elements” (EPS for load reduction). General Check Point best practices for endpoint load distribution.
NEW QUESTION 65 Before installing the Endpoint Security Management Server, it is necessary to consider this:
Installing the Endpoint Security Management Server (EMS) requires careful planning to ensure compatibility and performance within the Check Point environment. TheCheck Point Harmony Endpoint Server Administration Guide R81.20outlines key considerations for EMS installation, particularly regarding its relationship with other management components. Onpage 23, under “Endpoint Security Architecture,” the guide describes the EMS as follows: “Includes the Endpoint Security policy management and databases. It communicates with endpoint clients to update their components, policies, and protection data.” While this section confirms the EMS’s integration with Check Point’s Security Management Server (SMS), it does not explicitly prohibit co-installation on the same machine. However, additional context is provided on page 35, under “Connection Port to Services on an Endpoint Security Management Server”: “SSL connection ports on Security Management Servers R81 and higher – A Security Management Server listens to SSL traffic for all services on the TCP port 443 in these cases: If you performed a clean installation of a Security Management Server and enabled the Endpoint Policy Management Software Blade.” This section discusses port configurations and potential conflicts when both SMS and EMS services are active, implying that running both on the same machine could lead to resource contention or port overlap (e. g., TCP/443 vs. TCP/4434). Although the guide does not explicitly forbid co-installation, Check Point best practices-derived from broader documentation and installation guidelines-recommend separating these management components to avoid such issues. Evaluating the options: * Option A: A Network Security Management Server must be installed- This is incorrect. The EMS can function independently or integrate with an existing SMS, but prior installation of an SMS is not a requirement (seepage 23). * Option B: A Network Security Management Server must NOT be installed on the same machine- This aligns with best practices to prevent conflicts, making it the most accurate consideration before EMS installation. * Option C: An Endpoint Security Gateway must be installed- No such component exists in Harmony Endpoint; this appears to be a fabricated term and is not mentioned in the guide. * Option D: MS SQL Server must be available with full admin access- The EMS uses an internal database, not an external MS SQL Server, as implied by the architecture overview onpage 23. Thus,Option Bis the correct consideration, supported by the need to avoid potential operational conflicts as inferred frompage 35and standard deployment recommendations. References: CP_R81.20_Harmony_Endpoint_Server_AdminGuide.pdf, Page 23: “Endpoint Security Architecture” (EMS components). CP_R81.20_Harmony_Endpoint_Server_AdminGuide.pdf, Page 35: “Connection Port to Services on an Endpoint Security Management Server” (port considerations).